Searching of - question of

You can see results of "question of" from all sources

TOP Pair word with 'question of':
TOP source with 'question of':
Australian Electoral Law

Warning: Undefined variable $sourceid in /home/sciencet/domains/corpuslegislation.uz/public_html/search.php on line 65
Total count of words:
239343
Count of Unique Words:

Warning: Undefined variable $sourceid in /home/sciencet/domains/corpuslegislation.uz/public_html/search.php on line 74
32581
Search results
# Result Source
1 But even in malfeasance cases, a hardline approach against the respondent on the question of remedies is in tension with the general law rule in Briginshaw v Briginshaw.26 Briginshaw is a well-known High Court case that provides that the standard of proof in civil proceedings is effectively increased where the allegations are serious or would have grave consequences. This makes 2003 a good time to reflect and take stock of Australian electoral law. Australian Electoral Law
2 Most Australian legislation ultimately leaves the question of remedies to the judge’s discretion: that is, remedies are to be granted on whatever grounds the judge thinks “just and sufficient,” given the “real justice,” or “substantial merits and good conscience,” of the case. This makes 2003 a good time to reflect and take stock of Australian electoral law. Australian Electoral Law
3 The question of new technology is not just one of framing regulations and systems of accountability to maximize the benefits of any cost-savings and improvements in accuracy and speed. This makes 2003 a good time to reflect and take stock of Australian electoral law. Australian Electoral Law
4 Rather, at root it is a question of how computerization can address and, ideally, enhance public trust and interest in elections. This makes 2003 a good time to reflect and take stock of Australian electoral law. Australian Electoral Law
5 While oldfashioned, individualized vote-buying is all but dead in today’s mass, relatively wealthy electorate, the question of improper and corrupt arrangements to attract electoral support is very much alive. This makes 2003 a good time to reflect and take stock of Australian electoral law. Australian Electoral Law
6 Section 47 [Scrutiny of Qualification and Elections] Until the Parliament otherwise provides, any question respecting the qualification of a senator or of a member of the House of Representatives or respecting a vacancy in either House of the Parliament, and any question of a disputed election to either House, shall be determined by the House in which the question arises. Section 3 [Governmental Remuneration] There shall be payable to the Queen out of the Consolidated Revenue Fund of the Commonwealth, for the salary of the Governor General, an annual sum which, until the Parliament otherwise provides, shall be ten thousand pounds. Australia Constitution
7 (3) Every Order, Resolution, or Vote, to Which the Concurrence of the Senate and House of Representatives may be necessary (except on a question of Adjournment) shall be presented to the President of the United States; and before the Same shall take Effect, shall be approved by him, or being disapproved by him, shall be repassed by two thirds of the Senate and House of Representatives, according to the Rules and Limitations prescribed in the Case of a Bill. Article I [Legislature] Section 1 [Legislative Power Vested] All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives. USA Constitution
Words
Pair words