Searching of - “not really
You can see results of
"“not really" from all sources
TOP Pair word with '“not really':
TOP source with '“not really':
Australian Electoral Law
Australian Electoral Law
Warning: Undefined variable $sourceid in /home/sciencet/domains/corpuslegislation.uz/public_html/search.php on line 65
Total count of words:
239343
Count of Unique Words:
Warning: Undefined variable $sourceid in /home/sciencet/domains/corpuslegislation.uz/public_html/search.php on line 74
32581
Warning: Undefined variable $sourceid in /home/sciencet/domains/corpuslegislation.uz/public_html/search.php on line 74
32581
Search results
| # | Result | Source |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The most famous case is Woodward v Sarsons (1875),27 which addressed administrative problems with the newly enacted secret ballot legislation by invoking the “common law of parliamentary elections.” In Woodward, an eminent bench held that an election could be voided on two grounds: (a) if there was “no real electing at all”—meaning the constituency did not have a free and fair opportunity of electing the candidate the majority might prefer; or (b) if the election was “not really conductedunder the subsisting election laws”— meaning the errors were so fundamental that, in a sense, a different method of election was used to that laid down in the legislation.28 The application of these tests is a matter of great conjecture. This makes 2003 a good time to reflect and take stock of Australian electoral law. | Australian Electoral Law |
Words
Pair words